← all SaaS

Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat

Both are open-source self-host replacements for self-hosted Slack-style team chat. Stats below are pulled live from the GitHub API at build time.

Mattermost Rocket.Chat
Health alive alive
GitHub stars ★ 36.6k ★ 45.3k
Last commit today 1d ago
Open issues 857 3688
License AGPL-3.0 (Team Edition) / Source Available (Enterprise)
Team Edition is AGPL and freely self-hostable; Enterprise features (LDAP groups, compliance export) need a license.
MIT
Setup time 15min docker-compose 15min docker-compose (Mongo + Rocket.Chat)
Monthly cost $5 VPS handles ~50 daily-active users on the Postgres + Mattermost server combo. $10 VPS — Mongo is the heavier process; tight on $5.
Good fit for Engineering teams that want Slack-shaped chat with code blocks and integrations. Communities and support orgs (livechat widget is built in).
Weak at Voice/video huddles are weaker than Slack's; mobile clients are slower. Default UI feels heavier than Mattermost; Mongo backups need attention.

Side-by-side data is sourced from /slack/ — the SaaS where these two land in the same comparison set.

When to pick which

If your team is engineering-heavy and would have stayed on Slack for the code blocks, integrations, and threading, Mattermost is the closer feel — its UI clones Slack's left-rail / channel grid almost line-for-line, the Slack import CLI ports your history losslessly, and the Postgres backend is friendlier to ops teams who already run Postgres for everything. Mattermost also wins on lightness: a $5 VPS comfortably hosts ~50 daily-active users, half what Rocket.Chat needs because Mongo is the heavier process. The trade is licensing — Mattermost's Enterprise tier (LDAP groups, compliance export, retention policies) is Source-Available, not OSS. Pick Rocket.Chat if you're running a public community or a customer-support org: the built-in livechat widget, omnichannel inbox, and looser MIT license make it the natural choice when 'users are not employees.' Avoid Rocket.Chat for tight engineering chat — its default UI feels heavier and the Mongo footprint adds a backup story your dev team likely doesn't want to own.