← all comparisons

GrapesJS + a CMS vs Webstudio

Self-host pick — both replace Webflow (Visual website builder + CMS).

Both GrapesJS + a CMS and Webstudio self-host as a replacement for Webflow (Visual website builder + CMS). Pick Webstudio if you want the lighter footprint — 30min docker-compose (or use the hosted free tier), $10 vps for builder + postgres; deploy output is static. Pick GrapesJS + a CMS if you need teams that want full control of the editor + storage stack — 60min+ (you assemble: GrapesJS editor + a backend like Strapi/Directus) and $10 vps once assembled.

GrapesJS + a CMSopen-sourceWebstudioopen-source
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
Setup time60min+ (you assemble: GrapesJS editor + a backend like Strapi/Directus)30min docker-compose (or use the hosted free tier)
Monthly cost$10 VPS once assembled.$10 VPS for builder + Postgres; deploy output is static.
GitHubGrapesJS/grapesjs ★ 25.8k · last commit 2w agoalivewebstudio-is/webstudio ★ 8.56k · last commit 1d agoalive
ReplacesWebflowWebflow

Good fit for

GrapesJS + a CMS

Teams that want full control of the editor + storage stack.

Weak at:Significant assembly effort; not a turnkey product.

Webstudio

Designers who liked Webflow's interface and want full ownership of the output.

Weak at:Younger project; CMS surface is thinner.

In a terminal? npx -y github:SolvoHQ/os-alt-cli webflow prints Webflow's self-host options including both — how the CLI works →

FAQ

Which is easier to self-host, GrapesJS + a CMS or Webstudio?

GrapesJS + a CMS: 60min+ (you assemble: GrapesJS editor + a backend like Strapi/Directus). Webstudio: 30min docker-compose (or use the hosted free tier).

What does each cost to run?

GrapesJS + a CMS: $10 VPS once assembled.. Webstudio: $10 VPS for builder + Postgres; deploy output is static.. Both projects are free and open source.

Do GrapesJS + a CMS and Webstudio replace the same SaaS?

Yes — both are open-source alternatives to Webflow.